From Barbeu-Dubourg
Paris, August 10, 1779
My dear Master

Let this please stay between us: that is, keep it secret, and reply quickly. It seems that your plan to borrow (by way of M. Grand and M. Le Pot d'Auteuil) has not succeeded. Someone that I know thinks it is possible to make it work by a certain method that he would communicate to you, and that he thinks would not displease you. However, he wants first of all to be informed, with the frankness of which he knows you are capable, of the propositions which you were planning to make to the lenders, and of the profit that you were to accord to these gentlemen, your notary and banker, for their troubles, efforts and assistance. 1. What sum would you have received from each individual, at minimum? a thousand ecus, a hundred ecus? more, less? in order to provide each with the most possible ease, and to draw from a multitude of small accounts. 2. What interest would you have guaranteed? Was it more or less than six percent of the capital? 3. Was the term of reimbursement determined? Was it at the end of the war? Or one, or several years after? 4. Was it not in the name, or on the authority of the Continental Congress that this loan would have been taken out? 5. Would not the interests have been paid annually by you in Europe, in your capacity as Minister of the United States? 6. Was not the reimbursement to be carried out in Europe as well, when the time came, by you, or by your successors? 7. Would you not have granted one or two percent profit (a remittance, or brokerage fee, or however one wishes to call it) to the person or persons who would procure you the money to be borrowed? 8. To facilitate the methods of borrowing, would you not have adopted the method often used in France, to receive the sum to be loaned partly in cash, and partly in paper money from the General Congress, or from one of the individual states, now united? And in what proportion would you accept these? For example, half cash and half paper money, or three quarters cash and one quarter paper money, or nine-tenths in cash, and only a tenth in paper money? 9. Would you not promise not to use anyone else for loans of the same nature, if you had been well served by the connection that I have the honor of proposing to you, and if this fairly satisfied your needs?

These are my client's questions, which I don't think you would have difficulties answering, as they seem to me fairly simple. Therefore I ask you to satisfy his French vivacity as soon as you can.

I am with a tender and respectful attachment, dear friend, your most obedient, humble servant

Dubourg

Allow me to add a question of my own here. I have two different titles of credit from someone in Boston. I would willingly withdraw 25 louis, if the United States, or one of the states, wished to receive them on their original value (what we call au pair) and give me in return for this sum some land to clear in one or several colonies, or all together to form one single farm, or by at least one hundred-acre partitions. The Congress would have nothing to disburse in order to withdraw this portion of the papers, which, being honorable, it will have to do sooner or later. I understand that by any other means I cannot do this without a great loss; but this way it is not an advantage to me either, at present. And if I were to gain instead of lose on this, what should it matter to the Congress as long as it is not their loss, and that it would not be a financial burden to anyone, either individually or in general? Notation: Dubourg Paris August 10 1779.