To [Joseph Smith?]
ALS (postscript only): William C. Coles, Moorestown, N.J. (1954)
p.s.
April 12, [1770]
Yesterday I attended the Board of Trade and the Objections to the
Bergen Act were repeated by my Lord Hillsborough, viz. that it
related to private Property; in a Course of Trial at Law, which was
stopt by the Act. I alledg’d that it was only a supplementary Act
for compleating a Business directed by a former Act and partly
executed, which former Act had received the Royal Approbation. His
Lordship answered, that in the former there was the Consent of all
Parties; but to this Act, one Side not only did not consent, but
had opposed and entred a Caveat against it, notwithstanding which
it had been passed. I mentioned that the Opposer had approv’d and
solicited the former Act, and this was only to finish, &c. To
which it was answered, that in this the Commissioners were totally
changed, it was a new Sett. On the whole I endeavoured to clear the
Legislature from any Suspicion of Injustice or Partiality, they
having had only the Publick Peace in View, &c &c. But it
seem’d determin’d to report the Act as unfit for his Majesty’s
Approbation. The Paper-money Act then came on, when I was told that
an Act of the same kind pass’d by Governor Colden in New York had
been considered by His Majesty’s Law Servants who had reported it
repugnant to the Act of Parliament inasmuch as it made the Bills a
legal Tender to the Treasurer in Discharge of Publick Debts,
whereas the Statute says they shall be a legal Tender in no Case
whatever. I urg’d that it was impossible to suppose that the
Parliament intended to leave the Governments at Liberty to refuse
their own Bills; that this Act of New Jersey only oblig’d the
Loan-Offices that issued the Bills to receive them again when
tender in Discharge of the Mortgages on which they had been issued,
&c. On which I was cut short with this, That the Board could
not judge of the Intention of an Act of Parliament but by its
Words, and if a Colony Act was against the Words of an Act of
Parliament, that was sufficient to obstruct its being allowed.
However, I was told, that it was their Lordship’s Purpose to report
the Matter specially, viz. That this Act of New Jersey contain’d a
Clause similar to that in the Act of New York, on Account of which
the latter had been repealed; and so submit it to his Majesty. Thus
ended that Matter. Mr. Charles, I understand, is urged by Lord
Dunmore, to petition the Parliament to explain that Act. He has
been unwilling to do it without express Orders from his Province,
as our Business in the Confirmation of Laws is constitutionally
with the Crown only; and applying to Parliament to obtain Leave of
the King to pass Colony Acts, would be a Novelty, and possibly be
hereafter attended with disagreable Consequences: And the Ministry,
who procured the Act, were the properest to procure its
Explanation. I think he was right. He has however, as I understand,
lately received such Orders, and will now petition, in order if he
succeeds, to obtain an Allowance of the Act passed by Sir Henry
Moore, previous to that by Governor Colden. Should this be done,
the Removing of the Objection with regard to that Act will operate
in our favour likewise; and if done before ours is actually
repealed, we may still obtain the Royal Assent. But I have little
Expectation of it, as I know that Paper Currency in general are
much against the Grain here. I [mov’d] for their Lordship’s
favourable Reporting two former Laws, that for Septennial
Assemblies and that for giving Representatives to the Counties of
Morris Cumberland and Sussex, which they were pleased to say should
be taken into speedy Consideration. I mention’d too the Desire of
Assembly, that the Act for amending the Practice of the Law might
not as yet be pass’d upon, as they had a Contemplation the forming
one that might be better adapted to the purpose of which Notice was
taken. And I shall continue my best Attention to these Affairs of
your Province on all Occasion. Mr. Jackson is now appointed
Counsellor to the Board of Trade. All Colony Acts are submitted to
the Examination of that Officer; and as he well understands our
Affairs, and is a Friend to America, I hope we shall not hereafter
be pestered with ignorant frivolous Objections to our Laws, as
heretofore has sometimes been the Case.
I send you inclosed Govr Pownall’s Speech in Parliament, when he
mov’d for the total Repeal of the last Duty Act; only 20 were
printed. Also his State of the Case of America as to the Military
Power there.
Endorsed: Letter from Dr. Franklin April 12.
625504 = 017-120a.html