Extract of a Letter to another friend from B. F.
By the Original Law of Nations, War and Extirpation was the Punishment of Injury, Humanising by Degrees, it admitted Slavery instead of Death. A farther Step was, the Exchange of Prisoners instead of Slavery. Another, to respect more the Property of private Persons under Conquest, and be content with acquired Dominion. Why should not this Law of Nations go on improving? Ages have intervened between its several Steps; but, as knowledge of late increases rapidly, why should not those Steps be quickened? Why should it not be agreed to as the future Law of Nations that in any War hereafter the following descriptions of Men should be undisturbed have the protection of both Sides, and be permitted to follow their Employments in Surety Viz:
1. The Cultivators of the Earth, because they labour for the Subsistence of Mankind.
2. Fishermen for the same Reason.
3. Merchants and Traders, in unarmed Ships, who accomodate different Nations by communicating and exchanging the Necessaries and Inconveniencies of Life.
4. Artists and Mechanics inhabiting and working in open Towns.
It is hardly necessary to add that the Hospitals of Enemies should be unmolested, they ought to be assisted.
In short I would have nobody fought with, but those who are paid for fighting. If obliged to take Corn from the Farmer, Friend or Enemy, I would pay him for it, the same for the Fish or Goods of the others.
This once established that Encouragement to War which arises from a Spirit of Rapine, would be taken away and Peace therefore more likely to continue and be lasting.
It is for the Interest of Humanity in general that the Occasions of War, and the Inducements to it should be diminished.
If Rapine is abolished, one of the Encouragements to War is taken away, and Peace therefore more likely to continue and be lasting.
The practice of robbing Merchants on the High Seas, a remnant of the ancient Piracy, tho’t it may be accidentally beneficial to particular Persons, is far from being profitable to all engaged in it, or to the Nation that Authorizes it. In the beginning of a War some rich Ships not upon their guard, are surprized and taken. This encourages the first Adventurer to fit out more armed Vessels, and many others to do the same; but the Enemy at the same time become more careful, arm their Merchant Ships better and render them not so easy to be taken, they go also more under the protection of Convoys, thus while the Privateers to take them are multiplied, the Vessels subject to be taken, and the Chances or Profit are diminished; so that many Cruizes are made wherein the Expences over go the Gains, and as is the Case in other Lotteries, tho’ Particulars have got Prizes, the Mass of Adventurers are Losers, the whole Expence of fitting out all the Privateers during a War being much greater than the whole Amount of Goods taken. Then there is the National Loss of all the labor of so many Men during the time they have been employed in robbing; who besides spend what they get in Riot, Drunkenness and Debauchery lose their habits of Industry, are rarely fit for any sober Business after a Peace, and serve only to increase the number of Highwaymen and Housebreakers; even the Undertakers who have been fortunate, are by sudden Wealth led into expensive living, the Habits of which continue when the means of supporting it cease, and finally ruins them. A just Punishment of their having wantonly and unfeelingly ruined many honest innocent Traders and their Families, whose Subsistence was employed in serving the common Interests of Mankind.
Should it be agreed and become a part of the Laws of Nations, that the Cultivaters of the Earth are not to be molested or interrupted in their peaceable and useful Employment the Inhabitants of the Sugar Islands would perhaps come under the protection of such a Regulation, which would be of great Advantage to the Nations who at present hold those Islands, since the Cost of Sugar to the Consumer in those Nations, consists not merely in the Price he pays for it by the pound, but in the accumulated charge of all the Taxes he pays in every War to fit out Fleets and maintain Troops, for the Defence of the Islands that raise the Sugar and the Ships that bring it home: but the Expence of Treasure is not all. A celebrated Philosophical Writer remarks that when he considered the Wars made in Africa for Prisoners to raise Sugars in America, the numbers slain in those Wars, the numbers that being crouded in Ships perish in the Transportation, and the numbers that die under the Severities of Slavery, he could scarce look on a morsel of Sugar without conceiving it spotted with human blood. If he had also considered the blood of one another which the White Nations shed in fighting for those Islands, he would have imagined his Sugar not as spotted only, but as thoroughly died red: On these Accounts I am persuaded that the Subjects of the Emperor of Germany and the Empress of Russia, who have no Sugar Islands, consume Sugar cheaper at Vienna and Moscow, with all the Charge of transporting it after its Arrival in Europe, than the Citizens of London, or of Paris. And I sincerely believe that if France and England were to decide by throwing Dice which should have the whole of their Sugar Islands, the Loser in the throw would be the Gainer. The Future Expence of defending them would be saved; the Sugars would be bought cheaper by all Europe, if the Inhabitants might make it without Interruption; and whoever imported the Sugar, the same Revenue might be raised by Duties at the Custom House of the Nation that consumed it. And on the whole I conceive it would be better for the Nations now possessing Sugar colonies to give up their Claim to them, let them govern themselves and put them under the Protection of all the Powers of Europe as Neutral Countries open to the Commerce of all, the Profits of the Present Monopoly’s being by no means equivalent to the Expence of maintaining them.