From David Hartley (unpublished)
March 31. 1783. London.
My dear Friend.

I send you a Paper entiled Supplemental Treaty, the Substance of which I sent you some time ago, as I read it, in part of a Speech in the H. of Commons. I have given a Copy of it to M. L, as the Grounds upon which my Friend the D. of P:wd: have wished that any Administration in which he might have taken a Part should have treated with the American Ministers. All Negociations for the Formation of a Ministry in concert with the D. of P. are at an End.

The 10th. Article which is supposed to be refered to the definitive Treaty, is a Renewal of the same Proposition which I moved in Parliament some Years ago, viz on the 9th. of april 1778. I see nothing inconsistent with that Proposition either in the Declaration of Independence or in the Treaty with France, let it therefore remain, and emerge after the War as a point untouch’t by the War. I assure you my Consent should not be wanting to extend this Principle between all the Nations upon Earth. I know full well that those Nations to which you and I are bound by birth and Consanguinity would reap the earliest fruits from it. Owing no man hate and envying no Man’s happiness, I should rejoice in the Lot of my own Country and on her part say to ——— to America, nos duo turba Sumus. I send you likewise enclosed with this some Sentiments respecting the Principles of some late Negociations drawn up in the Shape of Parliamentary Motions by my Brother, who joins with me in sincerest Good wishes to you for health and Happiness. and for the Peace of our respective Countries and of Mankind. Your ever affectionate.

D. H.

1st. That it is the Opinion of this House, that whenever Great Britain thought proper to acknoledge the Independence of America the Mode of putting it into Effect most honorably for this Country would have been to have made the Declaration of Independence previous to the Commencement of any Treaty with any other Power. 2nd. That a Deviation from this Line of Conduct has the effect of appearing to grant the Independence of America solely to the Demands of the House of Bourbon, and not, as was the real State of the Case, from a Change in the Sentiments of this Country, as to the object and Continuance of the American War. 3d. That when this House, by its Vote against the further Prosecution of offensive War in America, had Given up the Point of Context and adopted a conciliatory Disposition, the pursuing those Principles by an immediate and liberal Negociation, upon the Basis of Independence, at the same time expressing a Readiness to conclude a general Peace with the allies of America upon honorable Terms, Would have been the most likely Way to promote a mutual and beneficial Intercourse between the two Countries—to establish Peace upon a firm Foundation, and would have prevented the House of Bourbon from having a Right to claim any farther Obligation from America, as the assisters of their Independence. 4th. That the Minister who advised the late Negociations for Peace has neglected to make use of the Advantages which the Determination of the House put him in Possession of, That, by his Delay in authorising Persons properly to negociate with the American Commissioners, he has shown a Reluctance to acting upon the liberal Principles of granting Independence to America as the Determination of Great Britain upon mature Consideration of the Question, and has by such Methods given advantages to the Enemies of this Country to promote and confirm that Commerce and Connexion between the United States of America and themselves, which during the Contest have been turned from their natural Channel with this Country and which this Peace so concluded has not yet contributed to Restore.
Endorsed: Copy Mr. Hartley’s Letter to Dr. Franklin 31. March 1783. Endorsed: Mr. Hartley to Dr. F. 31. March 1783.
639441 = 039-u245.html